"Eric Pouech" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Moving local atom support to wineserver makes it also a lot slower, > > and that's not acceptable IMO. > > > local atom is already in wineserver (before the patch) ;-) > only 16 bit atom is in kernel
Oops, sorry for the confusion then. I didn't really look at the code, only was reading your comments and was under impression that was the case. Sorry again. Do you know how NT handles that? -- Dmitry.
