Am Mittwoch, 29. Dezember 2004 21:26 schrieb Jacek Caban: > Hello. > > >Hello, > > > >this problem confuses me. I have started regession testing. It turn out to > > be a problem of 'out of tree' builds and the name of the directory > > containing the cvs tree. If i use the cvs tree as checked out from winehq > > widl crashes. If i rename the main directory wine of the cvs tree to > > wine-saved1 widl works. It looks like the length of the name makes this > > difference wine-123456 works also. Shorter names crash widl but in > > different files. If i build wine in the cvs tree itself it works too. > > I tried to reproduce a youre situation, but even with the same directory > names widl didn't crash. > > >Logfile of gdb session attached. > > > >Thanks Stefan > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > >GNU gdb 5.3.92 > >Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > >GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you > > are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain > > conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. > >There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for > > details. This GDB was configured as "i586-suse-linux"... > >(gdb) r > >Starting program: /usr/src/wine/wine-build/tools/widl/widl > > -I../../wine/include -I. -I../../wine/include -I../include -h -H oaidl.h > > ../../wine/include/oaidl.idl > > > >Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > >0x4009e05a in _int_malloc () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 > >(gdb) bt > >#0 0x4009e05a in _int_malloc () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 > >#1 0x4009d06c in malloc () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 > >#2 0x080525a0 in pp_xmalloc (size=11) at > > ../../../wine/libs/wpp/preproc.c:80 #3 0x0805264a in pp_xstrdup > > (str=0xbfffec68 "\"11:25:54\"") > > at ../../../wine/libs/wpp/preproc.c:108 > > It is probably caused by overwritting the allocated memory. The last > changes of widl look well so I think it is > some old hidden problem. Lookng at code I found a potential bug, but I'm > not sure if it a bug. In parsers, > both widl's and wpp's, strings are not duplicated whie adding to > structures. If it helps, I'll see if it is correct at all. > This is included in diffs: wppppy.diff and widl.diff. Could you try it? > I also found another small bug in wpp, but > it's not what we're looking for. I included it with some code cleanup in > wpppreproc.diff. > > Thanks, > Jacek
Hello Jacek, good shot, applying the three patches fixes my build problem. Many thanks Stefan
