Vincent B�ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So if we put them in a simple ok test, we'll get failures for some > chars, and if we put them in a todo block, then we'll get failures for > all the other cases which work fine. > > We could get on with a todo_table listing for which chars we fail, but I > think (Dmitry can correct me as I'm likely wrong here) these tests are > locale-dependant, so we're in for more problems using that method.
The tests should be fixed to not hardcode character values (or maybe only test a-z), we don't use the exact same Unicode tables as Microsoft so the test will never succeed 100%, and this won't be fixed unless we find an app that requires it. We don't want to provide our own Unicode tables just to satisfy the tests. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
