On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 01:57:29 +0900, Mike McCormack wrote: > SHELL_internal_function() is a better way to go, IMO. It's already the > Wine convention, you can easily locate the function, and it helps make > sure no two functions will be named the same thing. There's no reason > to make a new convention just because you think the old one is "ugly".
Given the only reason we do this anymore is for etags/ctags I think I will start investigating whether it's possible for a tags implementation to restrict scope in tag searches. Because yes I do think the DLLNAME_ prefix we have all over the place is ugly and unnecessary ...
