>>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Yeah, you can't go wrong there (adding a trace after the call). I am > more interested in finding out why a call isn't implemented in one copy > of Windows 98SE but is in another. Currently in the tests a fair number > are executed without checking for an error code. This is due to the > assumption that they are implemented on all recent versions of Windows > (95, 98, NT, 2000, etc). Finding calls here and there not being > implemented on versions of Windows that should have them throws a wrench > into that. We should probably just check the error code on all calls > (whether they're expected to pass on all platforms or not). > > Justin > If time permits (or if you beat me to it) I will create a patch that adds a check after each call. That way we can be sure we show actual info.
Cheers, Paul.
