Hi (again), I've applied OLE#75 and OLE#76 and now I've something that doesn't look right:
trace (without OLE75/OLE76 and with native stdole32.tlb): 000b:trace:ole:LoadTypeLib (L"C:\\windows\\system\\stdole32.tlb",0xa9d0dc) 000b:trace:ole:LoadTypeLibEx (L"C:\\windows\\system\\stdole32.tlb",0,0xa9d0dc) 000b:trace:ole:LoadTypeLibEx File L"C:\\windows\\system\\stdole32.tlb" index 1 000b:trace:ole:ITypeLib2_Constructor_SLTG 0x7e8702b0, TLB length = 4240 trace (with OLE75/OLE76 and builtin stdole32.tlb): 000b:trace:ole:LoadTypeLib (L"stdole32.tlb",0x3dd0dc) 000b:trace:ole:LoadTypeLibEx (L"stdole32.tlb",0,0x3dd0dc) 000b:trace:ole:LoadTypeLibEx File L"stdole32.tlb" index 1 000b:trace:ole:TLB_ReadTypeLib not found, trying to load L"stdole32.tlb" as library 000b:trace:loaddll:load_dll Loaded module L"c:\\windows\\system\\stdole32.tlb" : builtin 000b:trace:ole:ITypeLib2_Constructor_MSFT 0xe31180, TLB length = 4384 trace (with OLE75/OLE76 and native stdole32.tlb copied to \windows\system): 000b:trace:ole:LoadTypeLib (L"stdole32.tlb",0x80d0dc) 000b:trace:ole:LoadTypeLibEx (L"stdole32.tlb",0,0x80d0dc) 000b:trace:ole:LoadTypeLibEx File L"C:\\windows\\system\\stdole32.tlb" index 1 000b:trace:ole:ITypeLib2_Constructor_SLTG 0x7e9602b0, TLB length = 4240 Why do we use _SLTG in the first and last trace and _MSFT in the second? Cheers, Paul.
