On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 08:43:44PM +0200, Jacek Caban wrote: > I completely disagree. We can do much more than there is done right now. > shdocvw > is more than WebBrowser control and we can inplement those areas, but > WebBrowser > needs a lot of work as well. Mozilla ActiveX Control seems not to be > systematically > developed and the compability we need is not their aim. We need an > implementation > of WebBrowser based on MSHTML, which will be possible when I finish my work > on it. > This way we'll be able to implement shdocvw correctly (eg. it'll be possible > to > implement Internet Explorer OLE Automation), but now it's far, far away from > it > and really far from 100% complete.
This is a good discussion for WineConf. But sure, in the meantime feel free to submit a patch for this entry that better reflect your plans. In any event, I think such a significant effort probably deserves a bit bigger space somewhere else, but it will have to wait a bit until we can figure out where exactly. -- Dimi.
