On Dienstag 03 Mai 2005 16:43, Brian Vincent wrote: > On 5/3/05, Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I can suggest a simple rule to go by, as to whether to include a > > company or not. In order to be included, a company has to show that it > > has contributed (via it's employees or directly) a non-trivial patch to > > wine. We can even limit it to "in the past year". At the moment, I > > At some point over the next few weeks I'll throw something together > (feel free to beat me to it.)
Good! > I don't think we need any criteria about contribuing to Wine or a > "platinum" level. If you're crazy enough^H^H^H^H^H able to do > commercial support then we should advertise it. There's plenty of > companies who can do support without the knowledge to contribute. In > fact, you could think of them offering support as their way of > contributing. Support companies can also 'escalate' to someone else > if coding is involved. Exactly. > Also, I'll bet we won't have to worry about the list being too big any > time in the near future. > Let's not worry about that now. A lot of names would be good. I absolutely agree. Cheers, David
pgpHaV9E3PDj2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
