On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 11:27 +0200, Eric Pouech wrote: > well, I don't think we'd want to do the same mess for video than the one we > (I?) > did (started) for audio. > IMO, we'd be better off with a unique winevideo driver (from a windows point > of > view), which would then determine at startup time (or even at run time when > we > get HAL integrated) which unix driver to choose
Well yeah, but all this is a bit academic right now. Do we really have anything other than v4l out there? If no, we just have a naming issue :) ... eh, we might have other video solutions on Solaris and *BSD. So what we need is to figure out how similar they are. Anyway, maybe we should name it winevideo after all. -- Dimi Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lattica, Inc.
