Le lun 22/08/2005 à 07:58, John Smith a écrit : [snip] > 2. (not really relevant to this discussion, but relevant to the whole issue > of supporting end-users): binary RPMs for RedHat/Fedora on winehq.org are > still 20050524, and winecfg is pretty much useless there. If WINE team does > care about end-users, it would be nice to have binary RPMs for the most > popular distribution not that much out-of-date.
Yes, that's my fault. After moving in June, I haven't found the time yet to reinstall all my computer stuff (I'm typing this sitting on the floor with my keybord on my knees), so I don't know when I'll get back to it. I already missed two releases, and haven't produced any rpm for FC4 (for which I get a couple emails per week). If somebody wants to step up to the task (at least temporarily), I'd be glad to share my experience with them. Vincent
