Dan Kegel wrote:
Vijay wrote:
Any comments on why this patch has not been commited
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2004-October/013221.html
Probably because it does not include a conformance test.
If you like, you could help by turning
http://members.cox.net/~rgalbraith10/wine/bug824/demo824.c
into an unattended conformance test by following
the example in
http://winehq.org/site/docs/wine-devel/testing-test
- Dan
My approach to fixing bug 824 was considered sub-optimal by Alexandre.
I also agree and had intended to get back to this with a better
solution. Alexandre wants to maintain to the extent possible textual
representation of registry data. I now believe the right approach is to
simply always explicitly record ascii zeros as '\0' and consistently not
consider the end-of-string null terminator as part of the registry
data. Alas, I've had no time to test out this approach.
Regards,
-Randy Galbraith
