Lionel Ulmer wrote:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 08:39:28PM +0200, Tomas Carnecky wrote:
I don't really see any dfference between dlopen("libGL") at run-time and
linking x11drv with libGL at compile-time..
Well, suppose you want to do a 'full-blown' Wine distribution. You would
then link to libGL at compile time. And then suppose someone uses your
package on a machine without GL installed => the guy will not be able to do
anything as he won't be able to load the graphics driver (this case actually
happened some time back).
Well.. then make opengl a wine requirement... or build two packages:
wine with and without opengl.. (after all there are --with-opengl and
--without-opengl configure options)
I personally would vore for the first option, make opengl a wine
requirement, we'll soon have opengl integrated into the xserver (Xgl
etc.) so sooner or later everyone will need to have an opengl
implementation installed.
opengl should be installed per default on all desktop boxes (at least
through mesa in pure-GPL duistributions that don't want to have any
proprietary binaries)..
tom
