On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 20:15:06 +0200, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 19:53 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an app that tests the version number of certain dlls it uses on
startup.
The first seems to be riched20.dll
If I run it on 20050524 it starts and works.
If I run from the same installation after installing wine-0.9 (or just
about any winecfg based version) it starts throwing errors like:
riched20.dll version<unspecified> was found, this program requires at
least.....
I then have to pull in a native dll and tell wine to go native when in
fact the buildin functions work perfectly.
bug or feature?
I guess this was done intentionally or is a result of an intentional
change and seems related to winecfg becoming active.
What is the best way to deal with this? It seems a shame to install
native
dlls when the wine code does the job.
TIA
Hi,
don't have time (yet) to do stuff in Wine, but have a look at
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2005-September/020423.html
this shows you how to add version stuff to a dll.
cheers,
Paul
Many thanks, that looks like one answer. I could arbitarily give it the
version number my app is looking for , tho' that is not a very rigourous
approach.
I was hoping for some info as to why this worked before and not now.
Appartently earlier wine releases did return something that satified the
version check in the software.
Thx anyway, useful.
