Sunday, October 30, 2005, 9:52:40 PM, Robert Shearman wrote: > Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
>>This is by far not what native does. But we are not implementing the whole >>kernel here. So having just an object type ID will work just fine for what >>we need. >> >>Vitaliy Margolen >> >>changelog: >> server >> - Add object type to struct object >> > Why do you need this? It seems that having an object type field is > redundant since we can uniquely identify an object by the address of its > object_ops. Because the way I've implemented directory object it's not fully abstract. It needs to have a special case for symlinks lookups. Also I will need that for NtQueryDirectoryObject as it have to return object type name. I suppose I could compare obj->ops but that means they won't be static anymore and will have to be visible outside the file where they are defined. Vitaliy
