On Thursday 17 November 2005 01:59, Dimi Paun wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 23:56 +0100, Raphael wrote:
> > +    if (!bRet) {
> > +      ERR("Failed to CopyFileW(%s, %s)\n", debugstr_w(src),
> > debugstr_w(dst));
> > +    }
>
> You shouldn't issue ERR if the function can deal with
> the error condition. Just return the appropriate error
> code. ERR is to signal a case that should NEVER happen.
> This is not the case in any of the instances where you
> used ERR in this patch.

because the code who use this CopyFile is an hack.
And when CopyFile fail it revelant that we have a sequence problem 
So i keep it.

Regards,
Raphael

Attachment: pgpvb5a3AFgzl.pgp
Description: PGP signature



Reply via email to