Petr Tesarik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That means that Windows XP creates a new thread in the given process > and breaks it at DbgBreak(). > > Does this mean that we may avoid sending SIGTRAP altogether?
Creating a new thread is probably even harder, but yes we can certainly avoid SIGTRAP. One possible way is to use SIGUSR1 to change the thread context to simulate a call to DbgBreakPoint. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
