Duane Clark wrote:
On the other hand, in both Win2k and WinXP, "MS Shell Dlg" seems to be
mapping to "MS Sans Serif". So is having Tahoma the default really the
right thing to do?
And to respond to myself once again, according to:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/intl/nls_4qcn.asp
"On Windows NT 4.0/2000/XP/Server 2003/Vista, both map to Unicode-based
TrueType fonts. MS Shell Dlg uses Microsoft Sans Serif (which is
distinct from MS Sans Serif)... MS Shell Dlg 2 simply uses the Tahoma font"
So perhaps we should be doing that?
