Jeremy White wrote: > http://www.winehq.org/site/forums > > There is way too much information; the useful bits > (the Gmane and Google links) are buried way to deep imho.
Just took a look at it. I definitely agree! > For a while, the two were connected, until the old gateway > we were using broke down, and Jer ripped his hair out trying > to make it work. Apparently there was not enough demand that someone actually got it working again. Therefore I'm wondering whether it really fills the need that people has.. > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.emulators.ms-windows.wine > > That looks forumishy enough to me to satisfy many people, Of the problems mentioned at: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.wine.devel/41377 your idea provides a solution for 1, 2, 3 and 4. That's of course really nice. It doesn't have a solution for 7, which is something I think will be missed. > and yet is nicely backwards compatible with all current > systems. But is it good enough? It's rather inflexible since we can't change anything if we don't like it..
