"Dmitry Timoshkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It would be better, yes, but I don't see how adding new tests could avoid > that if the existing test fail already. I don't see how I can make existing > tests not fail while adding new ones and not touching any real code. I can > resend the patch with omitting the lines in my patch which mark existing > (failing) tests as todo, is that what you need? Certaily I can have a look > why existing tests fail (do they fail for you?), but that has nothing to do > with this my patch.
No, the existing tests don't fail for me, otherwise they wouldn't be in the tree. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
