"Dan Kegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How about this: we combine the original sychronous approach > with the small preallocated cache as a fallback for when > no threads are waiting?
You need to have a thread waiting one way or another, since you need to perform operations on the client side that require a thread context. No, it's not an easy problem to solve, that's why it has not been done yet... -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
