On 6/24/06, Ivan Leo Puoti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are you implying 1.0 should be released with any known bugs at all? I thought only M$ did that sort of stuff.
I've never heard of any open source project waiting for all known bugs to be closed before going out of beta. There's always something more to be improved or fixed. 1.0 doesn't mean "perfect"; as I understand it, it means "good enough for normal people to use". That means not having lots of regressions all the time, and not needing extensive configuration before it will run anything properly.
But then I'm not really a developer. -- Vincent Povirk
