On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 12:58 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Some original tests still fail for NT4, haven't looked into that (yet). > > > > Changelog > > Fix returncodes for NtOpenKey (with tests) > > This breaks the advapi32 tests: > > ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M advapi32.dll -T ../../.. -p > advapi32_test.exe.so registry.c && touch registry.ok > registry.c:553: Test failed: expected ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER, got 998 > The tests for NtOpenKey succeed. As RegOpenKeyA (RegOpenKeyExA) calls NtOpenKey does that mean return values should differ between the two?
Paul.
