On 7/1/06, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Thomas Kho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm currently looking into what would be required for something like a
> symlink to wcmd.exe, but at the same time I'm wondering the historical
> reasons for choosing 'wcmd' and if it should be changed to just 'cmd'.
Yes, I think it should be renamed to cmd.exe, at this point it's
supposed to be a complete replacement.
It's a ~500k patch to rename programs/wcmd to programs/cmd so I want
to get this as right as possible prior to submitting a patch. How much
of wcmd's identity should remain? That is--should it be a wholesale
s/wcmd/cmd or should wcmd keep the name wcmd with just the executable
name changed?
Thomas Kho
