On 7/14/06, Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Donnerstag 13 Juli 2006 22:07 schrieb Frank Richter: > I think the article exaggerates. (a) it refers to one driver which > exhibits the problem - Matrox G400 GL, on Win32. Linux drivers may > actually all properly support that function. (b) you could use a cap - > e.g. never report more than 50% of the total system ram as VRAM. Or use > that as a threshold for a heuristic - if more than that amount of > textures are reported as "resident", assume the logic is broken. I tried the sample program on my Linux box (radeon M9, 64 mb vram) and I don't think that it reported correct values. It said 32 mb textures, not all resident. While I have a 1400x1050 resolution I don't think it eats 32 mb vidmem.
Yeah, not at all. Graphics card video ram these days far exceed whats needed for video modes. Just a quick number crunch shows [EMAIL PROTECTED] only requires approx 5.6MB. Most of the ram is used for textures, I believe. I think the worst case at detecting amount of video ram is stuffing it with textures and guessing how much went in.
