Am Dienstag 28 November 2006 22:05 schrieb Markus Amsler: > Stefan Dösinger wrote: > > I proposed getting rid of COM some time ago, but I didn't consider that > > we need some features like inheritance. > > > > I think we should keep COM, but get rid of the D3D-Specific Addrefs > > because they are different between the various versions d3d versions. So > > keep the AddRef in IUnknown methods(QueryInterface namely), and > > GetParent, but do not AddRef in d3d methods(SetTexture / GetTexture, ...) > > > > Opinions? > > From my point of view (solving d3dx implicit surface refcounts) the > GetParent AddRef is ugly. It spreads d3dx refcounting across d3dx and > wined3d. It would be easier to only do d3dx refcounting in d3dx. > > But that's only my pragmatic view, without further COM knowledge. Well, GetParent isn't part of IUnknown(its a wined3d invention), so from the COM point of view we're fine to do whatever we want with it. (Just QueryInterface has the rule that it addrefs the returned interface)
pgpI5qimwsu1l.pgp
Description: PGP signature
