On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 19:51 +0100, Felix Nawothnig wrote: > Misha Koshelev wrote: > >>>So do you think I should add a define like INSTALLUILEVEL_NOFLAGS > >>>somewhere set to 0xf then? > >>Shouldn't that be 0x7? > > I guess either one would work since the first flag is 0x20. Do I need to > > change it to 0x7 or leave as is? > > So would 0x1f or 0xfffffe1f. Doesn't make it correct and could fail if > there are undocumented flags (that gap before 0x20 looks suspicious to > me...) - and that's more likely than undocumented levels imho (and even > with 0x7 we cover another 2). > > Felix
Ok, sent a patch update. Sound reasonable. Misha
