> > In general the most useful pieces of information are ... complete > > terminal output, $PWD and the command used to start an application. > > Also the exact Wine version $(wine --version), and where did it came > > from (self-compiled or binary). All of them are absent from the > > report. > > That's one report generated by apport, which is, as you and others > were writing, totally useless (that was my first impression, too) > > So, I'll go back to normal business for bugreporting and pointing the > users to winedbg.
Again, if you can get it to run the backtrace with "wine-pthread" as binary, it will likely be better. (gdb wine-pthread, attach pid, bt ... does show more) I have however no clue how apport works and if this can be done there. Ciao, Marcus
