Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
It look like configure is checking for the availability of lcms.h:
configure:6948: checking lcms.h usability
configure:6965: gcc -m32 -c -Wcast-qual conftest.c >&5
configure:6971: $? = 0
configure:6985: result: yes
configure:6989: checking lcms.h presence
configure:7004: gcc -m32 -E conftest.c
configure:7010: $? = 0
configure:7024: result: yes
configure:7057: checking for lcms.h
configure:7065: result: yes
configure:6948: checking lcms/lcms.h usability
configure:6965: gcc -m32 -c -Wcast-qual conftest.c >&5
conftest.c:65:23: error: lcms/lcms.h: No such file or directory
Mine is at /usr/include/lcms.h (and it's found). Shouldn't that be
enough to satisfy configure? I doubt anyone will have both.
Yes it's enough, only one of them needs to be found. What you are
probably lacking is the .so symlink, the new code is more strict about
this to make sure we always find the correct library soname.
This is a dir listing:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] usr]# ll lib*/*lcms*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 2007-06-19 16:51 lib64/liblcms.so ->
liblcms.so.1.0.16
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 2007-06-18 17:35 lib64/liblcms.so.1 ->
liblcms.so.1.0.16
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 206032 2007-02-08 12:21 lib64/liblcms.so.1.0.16
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 2007-06-19 16:51 lib/liblcms.so ->
liblcms.so.1.0.16
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 2007-06-18 17:35 lib/liblcms.so.1 ->
liblcms.so.1.0.16
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 206720 2007-02-08 12:20 lib/liblcms.so.1.0.16
It's the first time I actually looked deeper into configure.ac/configure so bear
with me. This part look suspicious in configure.ac:
832 WINE_NOTICE_IF([test "$ac_cv_lib_lcms_cmsOpenProfileFromFile" =
"yes"],[liblcms development files not found.
833 Wine will be built without Color Management support. (mscms.dll)])
Shouldn't that be != "yes" ?
Cheers,
Paul.
