Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
a patch somewhat like this?
Yes; it may be better to do that in extract_test() since we get the
test name there, it avoids hardcoding _test.exe at two different
places. But the general principle is fine.
It doesn't make the code simpler though. When changing extract_test I also have
to make sure that the tests are not run (--list) in get_subtests. I still have
to get rid of the "_test.exe" in extract_test. I have to fiddle with
test->exename and test->name etc...
Couldn't I just add a 'static const char testexec[] = "_test.exe" at the top?
Cheers,
Paul.
