Paul Vriens wrote:
Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
On So, 2007-08-12 at 10:50 +0200, Stefan Leichter wrote:
Can somebody confirm if all oleaut32 tests run correctly on Wine.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/wine.cvs/bin$ wine dlls/oleaut32/tests/oleaut32_test.exe.so
vartest
...
vartest.c:3129: Test failed: got VT_R8(-145) expected VT_R8(-1.4)
vartest: 1031878 tests executed (0 marked as todo, 1 failure), 0
skipped.
Intel P4 2GHz / Ubuntu 6.06
Should we think about localisation?
That's the reason for the failure!
LANG="en_GB.UTF-8" wine ... => 0 failures
Also for "en_GB", "it_IT", "fr_FR", "gr_GR", ....
Of course we are running both debian base distributions. This might
be another item to look on.
Not needed.
Our tests are not correct for w2k and below.
My w2k_sp4(german) has 539 failures and includes the failure from wine:
vartest.c:3129: Test failed: got VT_R8(-145) expected VT_R8(-1.4)
The WRT-Resultpage has 536 failures for w2k:
http://test.winehq.org/data/200708071000/2000_W2KProf-Admin/oleaut32:vartest.txt
OK, we have a few results now and it we know that localization is
important. This however doesn't fix it for me, so there are more variables.
I'm running on FC7 x86_64 with gcc 4.1.2. If people can post there
versions etc.. we can maybe come up with the other variables (this also
means people where the tests succeeds).
So far:
- localization influences the tests (which make sense because of the '.'
in 1.45 which is a ',' in other locales)
- I have 2 failures reported (with the same results) on a FC6/FC7
x86_64. So maybe the 64-bit is a variable as well.
Cheers,
Paul.
Just installed a new F7 (x86) and the failures are present there as well. So
it's most likely not a 64bit thingy. Could thus be gcc related?
Could we rewrite the test:
VARROUND(DATE,-1.45,1,DATE,-1.4);
as :
VARROUND(DATE,(-145/100),1,DATE,-1.4);
to overcome the decimal separator issue. Or do we need other means to construct
the 1.45/1,45?
Cheers,
Paul.
