On Monday 17 September 2007, you wrote: > On Monday 17 September 2007 15:10:39 Kuba Ober wrote: > > > I obviously tried WINE then, but it didn't work, > > > however, dosbox works with it (though slow, obviously) > > > > Wine will not be any faster. Dosbox doesn't emulate the CPU (at least > > when run on x86 machines), it's your old good VM environment, just like > > if you ran DOS under win9x.
> Isn't the whole point of DOSBox to emulate an old computer with all the > necessar stuff like SoundBlaster 16? Last I checked it had a setting to > set the number of emulated cycles. Hmm, I guess I was very much wrong then. I thought it was a VM thing with virtualization of hardware. I guess the fact that I ran it long ago on 486 hardware and it was still fast enough back then made me assume it had to execute using hardware. I apologize for spreading misinformation around. Cheers, Kuba
