On 15/09/2007, Jesse Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/15/07, Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 15. September 2007 18:11:43 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
> > > Steven Edwards schreef:
> > > > Its not all of your files only some come through with junk letters
> > > > like this one has
> > > >
> > > > ¨s1*
> > > >
> > > > as the filename. Another one had the Eurosymbol Squared....it could
> > > > just be gmail being goofy as I noticed some of the patches come
> > > > through fine.
> > >
> > > I haven't tried webmail of gmail, but gmail received through thunderbird
> > > works fine for me. Not sure why webmail would be any different then pop3.
> > Working fine here too
>
> It has to be the webmail of gmail then. I see it on gmail.
I'm seeing the filenames as being garbled here on gmail as well, so it
does look like a gmail issue. I don't know about other webmail,
though.
If I select "Show original" from the "Reply" menu, I see:
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (X11/20070824)
which would explain why the people using Thunderbird can see it
correctly. I also see:
Content-Type: text/x-patch;
name*0="0003-gdi-Implement-BiDi-classification-of-characters-and.patch"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
filename*0="0003-gdi-Implement-BiDi-classification-of-characters-and.pat";
filename*1="ch"
So the name is fine. I'm wondering if it is the way that gmail is
processing the Content-Disposition line.
Do you want to file a bug report with Google, or should I do it?
- Reece
