On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 11:12:23AM +0200, Michael Stefaniuc wrote: > Dan Hipschman wrote: > > This is just a minor cleanup patch. Even if we're definitely sure a > > string doesn't contain any % signs, it's still better not to use it as a > > printf format string. > fputs() would be a faster alternative to that. Though i doubt that > matters in this case.
You're right, I just use fputs so rarely that I sometimes forget it exists. Feel free to change them, but like you said, it probably doesn't matter much here. Thanks.
