Paul van Schayck wrote: > Hey, > > On Nov 24, 2007 4:34 AM, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Saturday 24 November 2007 04:01:24 Trent Waddington wrote: >>> interesting. Do you have a list of contributors and their signoff on >>> this license change? >>> >>> Or is it just you two? >>> >> Well I didn't think that was necessary; but after some thought I realize that >> the AppDB only seemed to include a LICENSE file containing the GPL v2, while >> a GPL/AGPL v3 change would require previous code to be licenced under 'GPL v2 >> or later'. >> >> So I'm including the other authors in this mail to see if they agree, or have >> already licenced their code under GPL v2 or later > > Yup, I'm ok with that change. > > The image.php class was written by me for another project. And just > reused for the appdb. I've later included it all kind of different > projects (open and closed). And never really gave it a second thought. > Does this cause trouble? > > Paul > >
No, your own code can be licensed however you want in as many different ways as you want. Thanks, Scott Ritchie
