On Jan 13, 2008 6:53 PM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On my machine, we've been hovering between > five and ten test suite failures for some time > (see http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9916 ) > > IMHO one of the hallmarks of 1.0 should be reliably > getting zero test suite failures. > That would make regressions stand out like sore thumbs > instead of requiring developers to diff results > before and after their changes, and might > result in fewer regressions getting committed. > > How 'bout folks spend some time tracking > the current six odd failures down and cleaning them up? > - Dan > > -- > Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv > > >
Sounds like a worthy goal IMO. It seems theres much more than 5 or 6 things which need work though: http://test.winehq.org/data/200801121000/ Perhaps we should try and have the nightly suite also pass all tests -- or is this too much of a frivolous goal? -- Zachary Goldberg Computer Science & Engineering Electrical Captain of Penn Electric Race Team School of Engineering at the University of Pennsylvania
