On 07/02/2008, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Reece Dunn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > diff --git a/dlls/gdi32/tests/font.c b/dlls/gdi32/tests/font.c > > index 7e560d2..bfdb0af 100644 > > --- a/dlls/gdi32/tests/font.c > > +++ b/dlls/gdi32/tests/font.c > > @@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ static void test_GetGlyphIndices(void) > > flags |= GGI_MARK_NONEXISTING_GLYPHS; > > charcount = pGetGlyphIndicesW(hdc, testtext, (sizeof(testtext)/2)-1, > > glyphs, flags); > > ok(charcount == 5, "GetGlyphIndices count of glyphs should = 5 not > > %d\n", charcount); > > - ok((glyphs[4] == 0x001f || glyphs[4] == UNICODE_NOCHAR /* Vista */), > > "GetGlyphIndices should have returned a nonexistent char not %04x\n", > > glyphs[4]); > > + ok((glyphs[4] == 0x001f || glyphs[4] == UNICODE_NOCHAR /* Vista */), > > "GetGlyphIndices should have returned a nonexistent char or UNICODE_NOCHAR, > > not %04x\n", glyphs[4]); > > UNICODE_NOCHAR is a nonexistent char too. And if someone really cares > about the exact details they can always look at the test, we don't need > to duplicate all of it in the error message.
Ok, I'll drop this patch from my list. - Reece
