On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 27. Februar 2008 01:52:32 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > With regard to the other things in this thread, if the sysInternals > > group at Microsoft is willing to share the interface between their > > application and driver, wine could easily implement it (ultimately far > > more secure than the Windows solution), then the tools could run on > > wine. Unless you're expecting filemon running in wine to magically > > start showing all file access even from applications not using the > > Win32 API. > What is the use of just running those tools? Aren't there Linux equivalents > for it?
I don't know. Certainly procmon is lightyears ahead of strace in terms of usability, plus isn't limited to a single process. A google found that KDE will be providing a GUI app named "inspektor" but I couldn't find very much on it. What is your preferred utility for filling that niche (logging I/O calls)? > > If it was a test case for better driver support, then yeah, it is useful, but > just running those apps by cloning parts of them seems wasted effort to me > Those particular apps are useful to the point that every competent Windows sysadmin knows of them.
