Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> James Hawkins wrote:
>> Why don't you just name the new parameter the same name as the
>> function parameter ('buffer' or some variation)? junkpointer is a
>> terrible variable name.
>>
>>
> sure, I will change it.Actually what you should do is take advantage of the fact that the pointer is returned to simplify the code and avoid a second LoadStringW call. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
