Hi Dmitry, 2008/3/5, Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > "Maarten Lankhorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Oops, the other call has to be null terminated as well. > > > Do you have test cases for those changes? They look like > a noop to me. I ran into this bug when I used those functions. I would get [EMAIL PROTECTED]@#% or [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ from my ickle enumeration function... Of course I can't open those.
Cheers, Maarten.
