On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "James Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> What's the reason for checking the HeapFree here? Or what's the reason > for doing > >> it at all? > >> > > > > To show that the value returned is not in the heap. > > Isn't any of HeapValidate or HeapSize better in that case? >
Sure. It worked on XP and earlier so I didn't really think twice about it when I wrote the tests. -- James Hawkins
