Dan Kegel wrote: > On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 2:17 PM, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> If we have a stable wine prefix in 1.0, I don't see what could >> possibly be added in 1.2 that would break that. The idea is that, >> even if you add a new dll that needs to be registered in, say, 1.0.5, >> you still don't need to remove your wine prefix or reinstall any apps. > > Can I bring the discussion back to my proposal, > which was to have wine-1.0 notice old, unsupported .wine > directories, and do something sensible? > >
If we're going to force users to remake ~/.wine, it would be ideal if we only did that once. Then we could provide some sort of upgrade path if wineprefix changed again for some reason. I'm wondering if the case-insensitive FUSE project could be finished in time - this would allow us to both get a stable wineprefix and a case-insensitive .wine folder. This would save us the hassle of having to worry about converting case-sensitive but proper-prefixed .wine folders. Thanks, Scott Ritchie
