On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:58 AM, Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James Hawkins wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Juan Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >> Personally, I've thought that playing around with the > >> native LPC API might be interesting. I'm sure there are other areas > >> of the native API that are sparsely documented, and for which some > >> test cases might prove useful. > >> > > > > But is the API in question useful for the Wine project as far as > > fixing apps? I don't think we should devote SOC resources to a > > project that doesn't progress Wine beyond just implementing more APIs. > > It is useful for getting native rpcrt4 to work, which in turn is useful > for getting other COM DLLs to work, and so is potentially useful for bug > triage and identifying the source of bugs in builtin COM DLLs. >
LPC, yes, but the student just said the Native API. -- James Hawkins
