> Hmm, sorry, it is probably not a good idea to name a variable "null" - > it is just a little confusing. Maybe W_Null or even Wchar_Null or > to make it more obvious that it is a programmer-defined variable?
I agree, but Tomasz didn't name this variable, it was already in the code--that's how I missed it. I don't think it's a problem in this patch. --Juan
