On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 2:36 AM, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You certainly don't want to call through explorer for that, showing a > message box directly is fine.
Well, that's easier :-) > You have to be careful to only do it when > loading the main exe, not for any random dll load Yeah, I guess some apps tolerate missing DLLs by loading them manually. We'll miss a few problems (e.g. apps that delay-load but can't handle the missing dll) but that's ok. > also you have to properly handle the case of a missing X display right, and just not call MessageBox. Hmm, ideally we would send them to a web page that gave information tailored to the dll in question, but a MessageBox is good enough for 1.0.
