Nikolay Sivov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't think so. If the call fails testing return value doesn't make > any sense. In this case 'result' is uninitialized and remains > uninitialized after a call if it fails (here I mean a native too). So > why should we check something which has unpredictable value? > By the way first time I saw this here > 8fd6f0e26ae28f2ba4938e2fbcc4851f47baa53c..
The difference is that this was a todo_wine, so it's expected to fail and we don't want to test uninitialized data since that can cause random test failures. In your case the test is expected to succeed, so the only way you'll get uninitialized data is when the first test fails, and then it doesn't matter if we get a random second failure, the test failed already. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
