Hi Ambroz,
-
FILE_SYNCHRONOUS_IO_NONALERT );
+ read_timeout ? 0 :
FILE_SYNCHRONOUS_IO_NONALERT );
This looks incorrect. You probably want to compare to -1, not zero. Zero
means reads must not block at all, and -1 means read must wait forever
(not sure what zero timeout would work as expected with your patch, but
it didn't anyway and I think it maybe is broken in another place)
Also, please attach patches with disposition inline, not attachment (git
can do that) - this make review somehow easier.
Regards,
Andrey
Ambroz Bizjak wrote:
Hi,
Changelog:
server: fix async read on mailslot
------------------------------------------------------------------------
