> This enables the replacement pretty much unconditionally... do we want > that? I'd say so, unless we have evidence that it's a bad idea to do enable it somewhere, and the drawback isn't fixable.
> It also might make sense to give this its own file. It shares some code with the shader implementation(color correction, private storage). Of course that doesn't make a separate file impossible. I think we have quite a lot files in dlls/wined3d already, and the arb_program code isn't that huge with 3000 lines, we have a few files already. I don't like giving it its own file.
