2008/11/4 Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Nicolas Le Cam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> @@ -614,7 +614,9 @@ static void test_enum_provider_types(void) >> DWORD dwTypeCount; >> >> /* actual values */ >> - DWORD index = 0; >> + /* the first provider type registry key may not have a TypeName subkey >> + * we use the second one instead */ >> + DWORD index = 1; > > That's just moving the problem around, there's no reason that the second > one would always be guaranteed to have a typename. > > -- > Alexandre Julliard > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
(Resent because I've forgot to cc to wine-devel. Sorry) Thank you for your answer. I will shortly submit a modified patch that loop on Provider Type keys to find one that fits our needs. Nicolas Le Cam
