On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Francois Gouget <fgou...@free.fr> writes: > > > On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > > > >> No, CHAR is really supposed to be the same thing as char, since it's > >> used for strings. Otherwise you'll need casts all over the place. > > > > Ideally we'd check whether 'char' was signed or unsigned in Visual C++ > > for PowerPC (there was a Windows NT 3.51 for PowerPC). I doubt that > > Microsoft would have made it unsigned and then we'd need to do the same > > to really be source compatibile. > > Sure, but we would do that by adding -fsigned-char in winegcc, not by > making CHAR and char two different types.
Oh. Good point. I forgot about that one. I guess that's a hint for Austin <g>... -- Francois Gouget <fgou...@free.fr> http://fgouget.free.fr/ War doesn't determine who's right. War determines who's left.
