Aurimas Fišeras <[email protected]> writes: > Alexandre Julliard wrote: >> We only want it when an actual app depends on it, otherwise we'd have to >> add exception handlers in all functions. Note that the Windows behavior >> often varies across versions too. >> > So why are we fixing various "Possible NULL pointer dereference" errors > reported by Coverity?
That's different, it's for cases where inspection of the code flow demonstrates that a NULL dereference can actually happen. In this case it would mean that some other part of the Wine code calls RegSetValueExA with a NULL pointer. Most likely the proper fix would then be in the caller. -- Alexandre Julliard [email protected]
